People v. Garoufalis
This text of 45 A.D.3d 604 (People v. Garoufalis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[605]*605Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Eng, J.), rendered July 28, 2004, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree (three counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620 [1983]), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt (see People v Candelario, 260 AD2d 391 [1999]; People v Figueroa, 219 AD2d 606 [1995]). On three separate occasions, the defendant introduced an undercover police officer to drug dealers, and aided in and abetted the sale of crack cocaine to the officer in exchange for currency. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power (see CPL 470.15 [5]), we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see People v Romero, 7 NY3d 633 [2006]; People v Brown, 36 AD3d 930 [2007]).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Florio, J.P., Covello, Angiolillo and Carni, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
45 A.D.3d 604, 850 N.Y.S.2d 104, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garoufalis-nyappdiv-2007.