People v. Garlais

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Garlais

281 A.D.2d 431, 721 N.Y.S.2d 257, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2095

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 5, 2001

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 281 A.D.2d 431 (People v. Garlais) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Garlais, 281 A.D.2d 431, 721 N.Y.S.2d 257, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2095 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [432]*432(Belli, J.), rendered March 10, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, attempted gang assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County [432]*432(Belli, J.), rendered March 10, 1999, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, robbery in the first degree, robbery in the second degree, assault in the second degree, attempted gang assault in the first degree, and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). O’Brien, J. P., Friedmann, Goldstein and Smith, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 431, 721 N.Y.S.2d 257, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2095, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garlais-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack