People v. Garfield

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Garfield

17 A.D.2d 845, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 22, 1962

StatusPublished

This text of 17 A.D.2d 845 (People v. Garfield) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Garfield, 17 A.D.2d 845, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1962).

Pincite

Opinion

Motion by appellant to vacate order dated March 9, 1953, dismissing his appeal from an order denying his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of conviction, granted; order vacated. Motion by appellant to dispense with printing on the appeal granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District [846]*846Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February 1963 Term; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion by appellant for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant’s ooram nobis application. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Motion by appellant to vacate order dated March 9, 1953, dismissing his appeal from an order denying his coram nobis application to vacate a judgment of conviction, granted; order vacated. Motion by appellant to dispense with printing on the appeal granted. The appeal will be heard on the original papers and on appellant’s typewritten brief, which shall include a copy of the opinion, if any, of the court below. The appellant is directed to file six copies of his typewritten brief and to serve one copy on the District [846]*846Attorney. The appellant’s time to perfect the appeal is enlarged to the February 1963 Term; appeal ordered on the calendar for said term. Motion by appellant for assignment of counsel denied. The appeal is from an order denying, without a hearing, appellant’s ooram nobis application. Appellant, therefore, either has in his possession a copy of the original papers to be used in the consideration of this appeal, or has full knowledge of the contents of such papers. Kleinfeld, Acting P. J., Brennan, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

17 A.D.2d 845, 1962 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 7585, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-garfield-nyappdiv-1962.