People v. Gardner

176 A.D.2d 1230, 576 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13934
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 4, 1991·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

— Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: The prosecutor’s reference in his opening statement to defendant’s prior conviction for driving while intoxicated does not require reversal because the conviction was a necessary element of the aggravated unlicensed operation of a motor vehicle charge (see, Vehicle and Traffic Law [1231] § 511 [3]; People v Miller, 163 AD2d 627, 629, lv denied 76 NY2d 942; People v Cooper, 158 AD2d 743; People v Koponen, 129 AD2d 838). Defendant’s remaining contentions lack merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Ontario County Court, Reed, J.— Felony Driving While Intoxicated.) Present — Callahan, A. P. J., Denman, Green, Pine and Davis, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Gardner, 176 A.D.2d 1230, 576 N.Y.S.2d 726, 1991 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1991).

176 A.D.2d 1230 (People v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lazzar
2004 NY Slip Op 24027 (Webster Justice Court, 2004)
People v. Powlowski
172 Misc. 2d 240 (Rochester City Court, 1997)