People v. Gardner

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Gardner

189 N.W.2d 738, 33 Mich. App. 270, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1738

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Gardner. Read the opinion of the Court — 37 Mich. App. 520 →

Michigan Court of Appeals·Decided April 28, 1971·No. Docket No. 9379·Published

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery armed;¹ he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging he was deprived of his right to speedy trial. He is appealing the denial [271]*271thereof. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery armed;¹ he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging he was deprived of his right to speedy trial. He is appealing the denial [271]*271thereof. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

People v. Gardner, 189 N.W.2d 738, 33 Mich. App. 270, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1738 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

189 N.W.2d 738 (People v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related