People v. Gardner

Michigan Court of Appeals

People v. Gardner

189 N.W.2d 738, 33 Mich. App. 270, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1738

CourtMichigan Court of Appeals

DecidedApril 28, 1971

DocketDocket No. 9379

StatusPublished

This text of 189 N.W.2d 738 (People v. Gardner) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gardner, 189 N.W.2d 738, 33 Mich. App. 270, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1738 (Mich. Ct. App. 1971).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery armed;¹ he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging he was deprived of his right to speedy trial. He is appealing the denial [271]*271thereof. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

Defendant was found guilty of the crime of robbery armed;¹ he petitioned for a writ of habeas corpus alleging he was deprived of his right to speedy trial. He is appealing the denial [271]*271thereof. The people have filed a motion to affirm pursuant to GCR 1963, 817.5(3).

A review of the briefs and records in this cause makes it manifest that the questions sought to be reviewed are so insubstantial as to need no argument or formal submission.

Accordingly, the motion to affirm is granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

189 N.W.2d 738, 33 Mich. App. 270, 1971 Mich. App. LEXIS 1738, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gardner-michctapp-1971.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack