People v. Garcia

266 A.D.2d 161, 698 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12352
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 239 A.D.2d 599

Opinion

—Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Richard Price, J.), rendered January 28, 1997, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the [162]*162third degree, and sentencing her, as a second felony offender, to a term of 6 to 12 years, unanimously affirmed.

In this buy and bust case, the arresting officer’s brief and limited testimony regarding the undercover officer’s drive-by confirmatory identification did not constitute impermissible bolstering (People v Gonzalez, 172 AD2d 276, lv denied 77 NY2d 995). We find nothing in the challenged testimony that could have unfairly influenced the jury’s resolution of the identification and credibility issues presented at trial.

We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. Concur— Sullivan, J. P., Tom, Rubin, Andrias and Buckley, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garcia, 266 A.D.2d 161, 698 N.Y.S.2d 486, 1999 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 12352 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1999).

266 A.D.2d 161 (People v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Gonzalez
172 A.D.2d 276 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)