People v. Garcia

229 A.D.2d 931, 645 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8954
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 196 A.D.2d 433

Opinion

—Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: There is sufficient evidence to support defendant’s conviction of conspiracy in the second degree (see, People v Schwimmer, 66 AD2d 91, affd 47 NY2d 1004). The People established an overt act, namely that defendant sent a photograph of the intended victim, a detailed physical description of her, and information concerning her whereabouts to an undercover officer posing as an underworld figure (cf., People v Bongarzone, 116 AD2d 164, affd 69 NY2d 892). We have considered the remaining contention raised by defendant and conclude that it is without merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Cayuga County Court, Corning, J.—Conspiracy, 2nd Degree.) Present—Denman, P. J., Green, Wesley, Balio and Boehm, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garcia, 229 A.D.2d 931, 645 N.Y.S.2d 377, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 8954 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

229 A.D.2d 931 (People v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Schwimmer
394 N.E.2d 288 (New York Court of Appeals, 1979)
People v. Bongarzone
507 N.E.2d 1083 (New York Court of Appeals, 1987)
People v. Schwimmer
66 A.D.2d 91 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1978)
People v. Bongarzone
116 A.D.2d 164 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1986)