People v. Garcia

151 A.D.2d 692
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Garcia. Read the opinion of the Court — 137 A.D.2d 402

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his brief, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Mclnerney, J.), rendered February 1, 1988, upon his conviction of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, the sentence being six years’ to life imprisonment.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant’s argument that the sentence imposed on him was so harsh as to violate constitutional limitations (US Const 8th Amend; NY Const, art I, § 5; see generally, People v Broadie, 37 NY2d 100, cert denied 423 US 950) has not been preserved for appellate review as a matter of law (see, People v Matos, 151 AD2d 509; People v Mateo, 144 AD2d 388). The sentence imposed was appropriate under the circumstances of this case. Mollen, P. J., Bracken, Rubin, Sullivan and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garcia, 151 A.D.2d 692 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

151 A.D.2d 692 (People v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Broadie
332 N.E.2d 338 (New York Court of Appeals, 1975)
People v. Mateo
144 A.D.2d 388 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1988)
People v. Matos
151 A.D.2d 509 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1989)