People v. Garcia

110 A.D.2d 659, 487 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48554
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 1, 1985·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Having reviewed the record before us, we conclude that Criminal Term’s denial of defendant’s motion to suppress physical evidence should not be disturbed on appeal. The evidence was properly recovered during a search incident to a lawful arrest based upon probable cause. Furthermore, in view of defense counsel’s repeated accusations during summation that the prosecution witnesses had fabricated their story, the prosecutor’s remarks in her summation were a fair response and did not prejudice the defendant (see, People v Marks, 6 NY2d 67, 77, cert denied 362 US 912). We have considered and find no merit in the additional contentions raised by defendant. Thompson, J. P. Bracken, O’Connor and Weinstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Garcia, 110 A.D.2d 659, 487 N.Y.S.2d 391, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 48554 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

110 A.D.2d 659 (People v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Norman
173 A.D.2d 866 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1991)