People v. Gambale

155 A.D.2d 552

This text of 155 A.D.2d 552 (People v. Gambale) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gambale, 155 A.D.2d 552 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1989).

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Huttner, J.), rendered September 22, 1986, convicting him of robbery in the second degree and criminal possession of a hypodermic instrument, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it [553]*553was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt of robbery in the second degree beyond a reasonable doubt.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining argument and find it to be without merit (see, Penal Law § 70.08 [3] [b]; People v Morse, 62 NY2d 205; People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Mangano, J. P., Thompson, Spatt and Rosenblatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Contes
454 N.E.2d 932 (New York Court of Appeals, 1983)
People v. Morse
465 N.E.2d 12 (New York Court of Appeals, 1984)
People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
155 A.D.2d 552, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gambale-nyappdiv-1989.