Home/Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York/People v. Gamarra

People v. Gamarra

126 A.D.3d 998, 3 N.Y.S.3d 614, 2015 NY Slip Op 02496, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMarch 25, 2015
Docket2008-01346
StatusPublished

This text of 126 A.D.3d 998 (People v. Gamarra) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gamarra, 126 A.D.3d 998, 3 N.Y.S.3d 614, 2015 NY Slip Op 02496, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2015).

Opinion

*999 Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lasak, J.), imposed January 23, 2008, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

Ordered that the sentence is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, he knowingly, voluntarily, and intelligently waived his right to appeal (see People v Ramos, 7 NY3d 737, 738 [2006]). The defendant’s valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Bradshaw, 18 NY3d 257, 264-267 [2011]; People v Ramos, 7 NY3d at 738; People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255 [2006]).

Eng, P.J., Skelos, Leventhal, Roman and Duffy, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Ramos
853 N.E.2d 222 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)
People v. Bradshaw
961 N.E.2d 645 (New York Court of Appeals, 2011)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
126 A.D.3d 998, 3 N.Y.S.3d 614, 2015 NY Slip Op 02496, 2015 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2509, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gamarra-nyappdiv-2015.