People v. Galpin

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Galpin

49 A.D.2d 654, 370 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 10, 1975

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 49 A.D.2d 654 (People v. Galpin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Galpin, 49 A.D.2d 654, 370 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1975).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Che-mung County, rendered June 21, 1974, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree. Defendant was indicted for one count of murder and one count of manslaughter in the first degree. Subsequently, he pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. Thereafter, on June 21, 1974 he was sentenced as a second felony offender, pursuant to section 70.06 of the Penal Law, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years. This appeal ensued, and defendant raises two issues. He contends that section 70.06 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional and that, on the basis of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence was "harsh and excessive”. These contentions have no merit. As to the first, we recently upheld the constitutionality of the second felony offender law. (People v Brown, 46 AD2d 255.) As to the second issue, we note that, as a result of defendant’s deliberate action, his wife is dead and his children are now motherless. Furthermore, defendant, under the statute, could have received a minimum sentence of 12Vi years. Under all the circumstances, we should not disturb the sentence imposed by the trial court. (People v Gemmill, 34 AD2d 177.) Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal from a judgment of the County Court of Che-mung County, rendered June 21, 1974, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of the crime of manslaughter in the first degree. Defendant was indicted for one count of murder and one count of manslaughter in the first degree. Subsequently, he pleaded guilty to manslaughter in the first degree in full satisfaction of the indictment. Thereafter, on June 21, 1974 he was sentenced as a second felony offender, pursuant to section 70.06 of the Penal Law, to an indeterminate term of imprisonment of from 6 to 12 years. This appeal ensued, and defendant raises two issues. He contends that section 70.06 of the Penal Law is unconstitutional and that, on the basis of the totality of the circumstances, the sentence was "harsh and excessive”. These contentions have no merit. As to the first, we recently upheld the constitutionality of the second felony offender law. (People v Brown, 46 AD2d 255.) As to the second issue, we note that, as a result of defendant’s deliberate action, his wife is dead and his children are now motherless. Furthermore, defendant, under the statute, could have received a minimum sentence of 12Vi years. Under all the circumstances, we should not disturb the sentence imposed by the trial court. (People v Gemmill, 34 AD2d 177.) Judgment affirmed. Greenblott, J. P., Sweeney, Kane, Main and Reynolds, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

49 A.D.2d 654, 370 N.Y.S.2d 249, 1975 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-galpin-nyappdiv-1975.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack