People v. Gallo-Kappus

2018 NY Slip Op 2337
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 4, 2018
Docket2016-09688
StatusPublished

This text of 2018 NY Slip Op 2337 (People v. Gallo-Kappus) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Gallo-Kappus, 2018 NY Slip Op 2337 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

Opinion

People v Gallo-Kappus (2018 NY Slip Op 02337)
People v Gallo-Kappus
2018 NY Slip Op 02337
Decided on April 4, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on April 4, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
REINALDO E. RIVERA, J.P.
CHERYL E. CHAMBERS
SHERI S. ROMAN
ANGELA G. IANNACCI, JJ.

2016-09688
2016-09820

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Joseph P. Gallo-Kappus, appellant. (S.C.I. Nos. 13V/15, 205/14)


Bruce A. Petito, Poughkeepsie, NY, for appellant.

William V. Grady, District Attorney, Poughkeepsie, NY (Kirsten A. Rappleyea of counsel), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeals by the defendant from two amended judgments of the County Court, Dutchess County (Edward T. McLoughlin, J.), both rendered August 10, 2016, revoking sentences of probation previously imposed, upon a finding that he violated conditions thereof, upon his admissions, and imposing sentences of imprisonment upon his previous convictions of criminal possession of stolen property in the fourth degree under Putnam County Superior Court Information No. 257/14 (reclassified as Dutchess County Superior Court Information No. 13V/15) and burglary in the third degree under Dutchess County Superior Court Information No. 205/14.

ORDERED that the amended judgments are affirmed.

The sentences of imprisonment imposed upon the defendant's violations of conditions of probation were not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80).

RIVERA, J.P., CHAMBERS, ROMAN and IANNACCI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Suitte
90 A.D.2d 80 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1982)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2018 NY Slip Op 2337, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gallo-kappus-nyappdiv-2018.