People v. Galligan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Galligan

95 A.D.2d 783, 463 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18697

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 6, 1983

StatusPublished

This text of 95 A.D.2d 783 (People v. Galligan) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Galligan, 95 A.D.2d 783, 463 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18697 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1983).

Pincite

Opinion

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered July 2,1981, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, rape in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. There was sufficient evidence to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial court’s ruling with respect to the inadmissibility of an alleged expert’s testimony was clearly within its discretion (Felt v Olson, 74 AD2d 722, affd 51 NY2d 977). Defendant’s other allegations of error are either unpreserved or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

— Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Seidell, J.), rendered July 2,1981, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, assault in the second degree, sodomy in the first degree, rape in the first degree and robbery in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. There was sufficient evidence to establish defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. The trial court’s ruling with respect to the inadmissibility of an alleged expert’s testimony was clearly within its discretion (Felt v Olson, 74 AD2d 722, affd 51 NY2d 977). Defendant’s other allegations of error are either unpreserved or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Titone, Bracken and Brown, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

95 A.D.2d 783, 463 N.Y.S.2d 268, 1983 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 18697, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-galligan-nyappdiv-1983.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack