People v. Galli

California Court of Appeal

People v. Galli

144 P. 973, 25 Cal. App. 633, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 208

CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal

DecidedOctober 27, 1914

DocketCrim. No. 235.

StatusPublished

This text of 144 P. 973 (People v. Galli) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Galli, 144 P. 973, 25 Cal. App. 633, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 208 (Cal. Ct. App. 1914).

Pincite

Opinion

Defendant was convicted at his trial by a jury upon an information charging him with the crime of selling alcoholic liquors in "no-license" territory in the county of Humboldt and was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars, in default of which he be imprisoned in the county jail of said county for the term of one day for each two dollars of said fine. *Page 634

The judgment was entered on June 9, 1913. Notice of appeal was duly given and demand to have the phonographic report of the trial written. Such transcript was written and was filed in this court on June 27, 1913, since which time no further steps have been taken by defendant in the prosecution of his appeal. The attorney-general, on the call of the calendar, moved that the cause be submitted on the record. There was no appearance by defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Defendant was convicted at his trial by a jury upon an information charging him with the crime of selling alcoholic liquors in "no-license" territory in the county of Humboldt and was sentenced to pay a fine of four hundred dollars, in default of which he be imprisoned in the county jail of said county for the term of one day for each two dollars of said fine. *Page 634

The judgment was entered on June 9, 1913. Notice of appeal was duly given and demand to have the phonographic report of the trial written. Such transcript was written and was filed in this court on June 27, 1913, since which time no further steps have been taken by defendant in the prosecution of his appeal. The attorney-general, on the call of the calendar, moved that the cause be submitted on the record. There was no appearance by defendant.

The judgment is affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

144 P. 973, 25 Cal. App. 633, 1914 Cal. App. LEXIS 208, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-galli-calctapp-1914.