People v. Gallerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gallerson

127 A.D.2d 786, 511 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43268

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 17, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 127 A.D.2d 786 (People v. Gallerson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gallerson, 127 A.D.2d 786, 511 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43268 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [787]*787(Rotker, J.), rendered November 26, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in. the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Order that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Runzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County [787]*787(Rotker, J.), rendered November 26, 1984, convicting him of attempted murder in the second degree, burglary in the first degree (two counts), assault in. the first degree (two counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Order that the judgment is affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with the defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf., People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Thompson, J. P., Niehoff, Weinstein, Runzeman and Spatt, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

127 A.D.2d 786, 511 N.Y.S.2d 795, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 43268, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gallerson-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack