People v. Galler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Galler

79 A.D.2d 1010, 437 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9909

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJanuary 19, 1981

StatusPublished

This text of 79 A.D.2d 1010 (People v. Galler) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Galler, 79 A.D.2d 1010, 437 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9909 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1981).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 1979, which, after a hearing, granted defendants’ motion to suppress certain physical evidence. On February 11,1980, this court modified the order, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provision which granted the motion to suppress as to defendant Rudy Vasquez and substituting a provision denying the motion as to him. As so modified, the order was affirmed. (See People v Galler, 74 AD2d 613.) Defendant Vasquez subsequently moved for reargument of the appeal. By order dated July 23,1980, this court granted the motion “to the extent of permitting the parties to submit briefs upon reargument of said appeal.” The briefs have been received and considered. Upon reargument we adhere to the original determination with respect to defendant Vasquez. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the People from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County, dated April 17, 1979, which, after a hearing, granted defendants’ motion to suppress certain physical evidence. On February 11,1980, this court modified the order, on the law and the facts, by deleting the provision which granted the motion to suppress as to defendant Rudy Vasquez and substituting a provision denying the motion as to him. As so modified, the order was affirmed. (See People v Galler, 74 AD2d 613.) Defendant Vasquez subsequently moved for reargument of the appeal. By order dated July 23,1980, this court granted the motion “to the extent of permitting the parties to submit briefs upon reargument of said appeal.” The briefs have been received and considered. Upon reargument we adhere to the original determination with respect to defendant Vasquez. Damiani, J. P., Mangano, Rabin and Gulotta, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

79 A.D.2d 1010, 437 N.Y.S.2d 929, 1981 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 9909, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-galler-nyappdiv-1981.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack