People v. Galarza

76 A.D.2d 906, 907 N.Y.S.2d 668
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Galarza. Read the opinion of the Court — 59 A.D.3d 365

Opinion

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Joseph J. Dawson, J.), entered on or about September 12, 2007, which adjudicated defendant a level two sex offender pursuant to the Sex Offender [907]*907Registration Act (Correction Law art 6-C), unanimously affirmed, without costs.

The court properly exercised its discretion in declining to grant a downward departure from defendant’s presumptive risk level (see People v Mingo, 12 NY3d 563, 568 n 2 [2009]; People v Johnson, 11 NY3d 416, 421 [2008]). Defendant’s lack of a prior criminal record was adequately taken into account by the risk assessment instrument (see People v Hansford, 67 AD3d 496 [2009]). Defendant’s remaining arguments are based upon scientific studies not presented to the hearing court, or are otherwise unpersuasive. Concur—Saxe, J.E, Friedman, Moskowitz, Freedman and Román, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Galarza, 76 A.D.2d 906, 907 N.Y.S.2d 668 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

76 A.D.2d 906 (People v. Galarza) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Mingo
910 N.E.2d 983 (New York Court of Appeals, 2009)
People v. Johnson
900 N.E.2d 930 (New York Court of Appeals, 2008)
People v. Hansford
67 A.D.3d 496 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)