People v. Gainey

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Gainey

143 A.D.2d 1039, 533 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedOctober 31, 1988

StatusPublished

This text of 143 A.D.2d 1039 (People v. Gainey) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Gainey, 143 A.D.2d 1039, 533 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1988).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered May 15, 1985, convicting him of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the prosecutrix’s summation comments complained of on appeal — to which no objections were registered at trial — do not require reversal of the judgment of conviction in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered May 15, 1985, convicting him of petit larceny and criminal possession of stolen property in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

Contrary to the defendant’s contentions, the prosecutrix’s summation comments complained of on appeal — to which no objections were registered at trial — do not require reversal of the judgment of conviction in the interest of justice.

We have reviewed the defendant’s remaining contention and find it to be without merit. Eiber, J. P., Kooper, Spatt and Harwood, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

143 A.D.2d 1039, 533 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1988 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 10489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-gainey-nyappdiv-1988.