People v. Gaine
1 Johns. 343
Opinion
In all cases where'the defendant applies to :set aside a verdict-, and thereby delays the plaintiff, interest ■is awarded. In this case, there has been no delay created by the defendant, and the verdict is -for the full amount of the penalty. Interest ought not, therefore, to be allowed.
Rule refused.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Gaine, 1 Johns. 343 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1806).
1 Johns. 343 (People v. Gaine) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Gibson v. Cincinnati Enquirer
10 F. Cas. 309 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Southern Ohio, 1877)
Dowell v. Griswold
7 F. Cas. 995 (U.S. Circuit Court for the District of Oregon, 1877)
Mann v. New York Central Railroad
12 Abb. Pr. 380 (New York Supreme Court, 1872)
Cook v. South Park Commissioners
61 Ill. 115 (Illinois Supreme Court, 1871)
Johnson v. Atlantic & St. Lawrence Railroad
43 N.H. 410 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1861)
Bull v. Ketchum
2 Denio 188 (New York Supreme Court, 1846)
Lord v. Mayor of New York
3 Hill & Den. 426 (New York Supreme Court, 1842)
Gibblehouse v. Stong
3 Rawle 437 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1832)
Hale v. Smith
6 Me. 416 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1830)
Lessee of Cluggage v. Swain
4 Binn. 150 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1811)