People v. Fynn

2021 NY Slip Op 05585, 198 A.D.3d 813, 152 N.Y.S.3d 616
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedOctober 13, 2021
Docket2018-06507
StatusPublished
Cited by5 cases

This text of 2021 NY Slip Op 05585 (People v. Fynn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fynn, 2021 NY Slip Op 05585, 198 A.D.3d 813, 152 N.Y.S.3d 616 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2021).

Opinion

People v Fynn (2021 NY Slip Op 05585)
People v Fynn
2021 NY Slip Op 05585
Decided on October 13, 2021
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 13, 2021 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
WILLIAM F. MASTRO, J.P.
SYLVIA O. HINDS-RADIX
VALERIE BRATHWAITE NELSON
LARA J. GENOVESI, JJ.

2018-06507

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Christian Fynn, appellant. (S.C.I. No. 7343/17)


Patricia Pazner, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Eric Gonzalez, District Attorney, Brooklyn, NY (Leonard Joblove and Jodi L. Mandel of counsel; Robert Ho on the brief), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Marguerite Dougherty, J.), rendered September 18, 2017, convicting him of failure to register a change of address, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing a sentence. Assigned counsel has submitted a brief in accordance with Anders v California (386 US 738), in which she moves for leave to withdraw as counsel for the appellant.

ORDERED that the judgment is affirmed.

We are satisfied with the sufficiency of the brief filed by the defendant's assigned counsel pursuant to Anders v California (386 US 738), and, upon an independent review of the record, we conclude that there are no nonfrivolous issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel's application for leave to withdraw as counsel is, therefore, granted (see id.; Matter of Giovanni S. [Jasmin A.], 89 AD3d 252; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606).

MASTRO, J.P., HINDS-RADIX, BRATHWAITE NELSON and GENOVESI, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Maria T. Fasulo

Acting Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Ricottilli
2025 NY Slip Op 01115 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2025)
People v. Munoz-Zuleta
2024 NY Slip Op 03832 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Potik
202 N.Y.S.3d 463 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2024)
People v. Guzman
182 N.Y.S.3d 639 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2023)
People v. Tissiera
179 N.Y.S.3d 602 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
2021 NY Slip Op 05585, 198 A.D.3d 813, 152 N.Y.S.3d 616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fynn-nyappdiv-2021.