People v. Futch

41 A.D.2d 598, 340 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5315

This text of 41 A.D.2d 598 (People v. Futch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Futch, 41 A.D.2d 598, 340 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5315 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1973).

Opinion

-Judgment unanimously affirmed. Hemorandum: At the time of sentencing the court was fully informed of defendant’s heroin addiction and made substantial reference to it before pronouncing sentence. There was no doubt as to whether defendant was an addict. Under these circumstances “ defendant is not prejudiced by failure to order an examination ” (People v. Carter, 31 N Y 2d 281; People v. Gordian, 39 A D 2d 861). (Appeal from judgment of Honroe County Court convicting defendant of robbery, second degree.) Present — Goldman, P. J., Harsh, Houle, Cardamone and Simons, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
41 A.D.2d 598, 340 N.Y.S.2d 414, 1973 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5315, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-futch-nyappdiv-1973.