People v. Furlow

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Furlow

194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6167

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJune 15, 1993

StatusPublished

This text of 194 A.D.2d 419 (People v. Furlow) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Furlow, 194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6167 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

Opinion

-—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered September 3, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 2 Vs to 7 years and 1 year, respectively, and order, same court and Justice, entered January 22, 1992, denying defendant’s post-judgment motion to vacate the judgment unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor’s remarks in summation, the court’s instructions to the jury being sufficient to prevent prejudice. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

-—Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Carol Berkman, J.), rendered September 3, 1991, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to concurrent prison terms of 2 Vs to 7 years and 1 year, respectively, and order, same court and Justice, entered January 22, 1992, denying defendant’s post-judgment motion to vacate the judgment unanimously affirmed.

Defendant was not deprived of a fair trial by the prosecutor’s remarks in summation, the court’s instructions to the jury being sufficient to prevent prejudice. Concur—Milonas, J. P., Rosenberger, Rubin and Nardelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

194 A.D.2d 419, 599 N.Y.S.2d 956, 1993 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 6167, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-furlow-nyappdiv-1993.