People v. Furlong
514 N.E.2d 1373, 70 N.Y.2d 756, 520 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18872
Opinion
OPINION OF THE COURT
Order affirmed. The legal issue raised has been rendered academic by amendment of the regulation to require' proof of intent to consume (cf., People v Lee, 58 NY2d 491).
Concur: Chief Judge Wachtler and Judges Simons, Kaye, Alexander, Titone, Hancock, Jr., and Bellacosa.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
People v. Furlong, 514 N.E.2d 1373, 70 N.Y.2d 756, 520 N.Y.S.2d 749, 1987 N.Y. LEXIS 18872 (N.Y. 1987).
514 N.E.2d 1373 (People v. Furlong) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State Ex Rel. Harkavy v. Consilvio
870 N.E.2d 128 (New York Court of Appeals, 2007)
People v. West
2004 NY Slip Op 24224 (New Paltz Justice Court, 2004)
Opn. No.
New York Attorney General Reports, 2003
People v. Kirk
275 A.D.2d 983 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2000)
People v. Bothwell
175 Misc. 2d 592 (New York Supreme Court, 1998)
George Villanueva v. Superintendent, Green Haven Correctional Facility
99 F.3d 401 (Second Circuit, 1995)
People v. Villatoro
158 Misc. 2d 557 (Westbury Justice Court, 1993)
People v. Buckley
142 Misc. 2d 262 (New York District Court, 1989)