Home/New York Court of Appeals/People v. Furet

People v. Furet

904 N.E.2d 832, 12 N.Y.3d 740
CourtNew York Court of Appeals
DecidedFebruary 19, 2009
StatusPublished
Cited by4 cases

This text of 904 N.E.2d 832 (People v. Furet) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Furet, 904 N.E.2d 832, 12 N.Y.3d 740 (N.Y. 2009).

Opinion

OPINION OF THE COURT

On review of submissions pursuant to section 500.11 of the Rules of the Court of Appeals (22 NYCRR 500.11), order af[741]*741firmed. The mandatory surcharge, crime victim assistance fee and DNA databank fee need not be pronounced by the court at sentencing (see People v Guerrero, 12 NY3d 45 [2009] [decided today]). The lower courts’ determinations regarding reasonable suspicion and probable cause, which are mixed questions of law and fact, have support in the record and are thus beyond our further review.

Concur: Judges Ciparick, Graffeo, Read, Smith, Pigott and Jones. Taking no part: Chief Judge Lippman.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Tookes
52 Misc. 3d 956 (New York Supreme Court, 2016)
People v. Baker
984 N.E.2d 902 (New York Court of Appeals, 2013)
People v. Morrison
36 Misc. 3d 880 (New York Supreme Court, 2012)
People v. Gray
92 A.D.3d 892 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2012)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
904 N.E.2d 832, 12 N.Y.3d 740, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-furet-ny-2009.