People v. Fulton

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fulton

281 A.D.2d 932, 722 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 21, 2001

StatusPublished

This text of 281 A.D.2d 932 (People v. Fulton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fulton, 281 A.D.2d 932, 722 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2001).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]) and four counts of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1], [3]). We reject the contention of defendant that he may have been convicted of unindicted offenses. Supreme Court’s charge to the jury and the verdict sheet addressed only those acts for which defendant was indicted (see, People v Whitfield, 255 AD2d 924, lv denied 93 NY2d 981). We have examined defendant’s remaining contention and conclude [933]*933that it is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Criminal Contempt, 2nd Degree.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment unanimously affirmed. Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon a jury verdict of three counts of criminal contempt in the second degree (Penal Law § 215.50 [3]) and four counts of harassment in the second degree (Penal Law § 240.26 [1], [3]). We reject the contention of defendant that he may have been convicted of unindicted offenses. Supreme Court’s charge to the jury and the verdict sheet addressed only those acts for which defendant was indicted (see, People v Whitfield, 255 AD2d 924, lv denied 93 NY2d 981). We have examined defendant’s remaining contention and conclude [933]*933that it is lacking in merit. (Appeal from Judgment of Supreme Court, Monroe County, Mark, J. — Criminal Contempt, 2nd Degree.) Present — Hayes, J. P., Wisner, Scudder, Kehoe and Burns, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

281 A.D.2d 932, 722 N.Y.S.2d 205, 2001 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 2819, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fulton-nyappdiv-2001.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack