People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fuller

234 A.D.2d 473, 651 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13120

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedDecember 16, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 234 A.D.2d 473 (People v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fuller, 234 A.D.2d 473, 651 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13120 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), rendered May 1, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

[474]*474Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the defendant’s arrest was based on probable cause (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v Sioba, 187 AD2d 317). The defendant’s remaining argument is without merit (see, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327; People v Williams, 205 AD2d 717). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Lewis, J.), rendered May 1, 1995, convicting him of criminal possession of a weapon in the fourth degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings up for review the denial, after a hearing, of that branch of the defendant’s omnibus motion which was to suppress physical evidence.

[474]*474Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The record supports the Supreme Court’s determination that the defendant’s arrest was based on probable cause (see, People v Prochilo, 41 NY2d 759; People v Sioba, 187 AD2d 317). The defendant’s remaining argument is without merit (see, People v Chipp, 75 NY2d 327; People v Williams, 205 AD2d 717). Bracken, J. P., Pizzuto, Santucci and Friedmann, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

234 A.D.2d 473, 651 N.Y.S.2d 900, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13120, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fuller-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack