People v. Fuller

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fuller

65 A.D.2d 823, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13714

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedNovember 27, 1978

StatusPublished

Cited by2 cases

This text of 65 A.D.2d 823 (People v. Fuller) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fuller, 65 A.D.2d 823, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13714 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1978).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 8, 1976, convicting him of felony murder, manslaughter in the first degree and three counts of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Each of the numerous contentions urged by defendant’s counsel and those cases cited by defendant pro se, as grounds for reversal, have been most carefully considered, and each has been found entirely devoid of merit. The Trial Judge was eminently fair in all of his rulings. This was a senseless killing of a 16-year-old boy during the commission of a robbery. Therefore, the sentence imposed may not be deemed harsh or excessive. Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Nassau County, rendered December 8, 1976, convicting him of felony murder, manslaughter in the first degree and three counts of robbery in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. Judgment affirmed. Each of the numerous contentions urged by defendant’s counsel and those cases cited by defendant pro se, as grounds for reversal, have been most carefully considered, and each has been found entirely devoid of merit. The Trial Judge was eminently fair in all of his rulings. This was a senseless killing of a 16-year-old boy during the commission of a robbery. Therefore, the sentence imposed may not be deemed harsh or excessive. Latham, J. P., Suozzi, Gulotta, Shapiro and Cohalan, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

65 A.D.2d 823, 410 N.Y.S.2d 1017, 1978 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 13714, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fuller-nyappdiv-1978.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack