People v. Fullen
This text of 118 A.D.3d 1297 (People v. Fullen) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[1298]*1298Appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Monroe County (David D. Egan, J.), rendered July 30, 2009. The judgment convicted defendant, upon a jury verdict, of rape in the second degree and criminal sexual act in the second degree.
It is hereby ordered that the case is held, the decision is reserved and the matter is remitted to Supreme Court, Monroe County, for further proceedings in accordance with the following memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him of rape in the second degree (Penal Law § 130.30 [1]) and criminal sexual act in the second degree (§ 130.45 [1]), defendant contends that Supreme Court committed reversible error in denying him access to the victim’s psychiatric records. Those records, which the court reviewed in camera, have not been included in the record on appeal. Inasmuch as the present record on appeal does not permit us to review defendant’s contention, we hold the case, reserve decision and remit the matter to Supreme Court to conduct a reconstruction hearing with respect to the missing records (see generally People v Yavru-Sakuk, 98 NY2d 56, 60 [2002]).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
118 A.D.3d 1297, 987 N.Y.S.2d 290, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fullen-nyappdiv-2014.