People v. Fuce

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Fuce

117 A.D.2d 616, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52889

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 3, 1986

StatusPublished

This text of 117 A.D.2d 616 (People v. Fuce) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Fuce, 117 A.D.2d 616, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52889 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1986).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under [617]*617indictment No. 846/83, and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1303/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by defendant from two judgments of the County Court, Westchester County (Nastasi, J.), both rendered November 7, 1983, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fourth degree under [617]*617indictment No. 846/83, and attempted burglary in the third degree under indictment No. 1303/83, upon his pleas of guilty, and imposing sentences.

Judgments affirmed.

We have reviewed the record and agree with defendant’s assigned counsel that there are no meritorious issues which could be raised on appeal. Counsel’s application for leave to withdraw as counsel is granted (see, Anders v California, 386 US 738; People v Paige, 54 AD2d 631; cf. People v Gonzalez, 47 NY2d 606). Lazer, J. P., Thompson, Rubin and Kunzeman, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

117 A.D.2d 616, 498 N.Y.S.2d 1001, 1986 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 52889, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fuce-nyappdiv-1986.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack