Home/California Supreme Court/People v. Fryman

People v. Fryman

76 P.3d 363, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702
CourtCalifornia Supreme Court
DecidedSeptember 10, 2003
DocketS107283
StatusPublished

This text of 76 P.3d 363 (People v. Fryman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fryman, 76 P.3d 363, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702 (Cal. 2003).

Opinion

4 Cal.Rptr.3d 702 (2003)
76 P.3d 363

PEOPLE
v.
FRYMAN.

No. S107283.

Supreme Court of California.

September 10, 2003.

Morris Lenk, Deputy Attorney General, San Francisco, CA, for the People.

Marylou Hillberg, Attorney at Law, Sebastopol, CA, for Tommy Lee Fryman.

Transferred to Court of Appeal, Sixth District, with directions to vacate its decision and to reconsider the cause in light of People v. Floyd (2003) 1 Cal.Rptr.3d 885, 72 P.3d 820.

GEORGE, C.J., and KENNARD, BAXTER, WERDEGAR, CHIN and MORENO, JJ, concur. BROWN, J., is of the opinion the matter should be retained.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Floyd
72 P.3d 820 (California Supreme Court, 2003)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
76 P.3d 363, 4 Cal. Rptr. 3d 702, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fryman-cal-2003.