People v. Frost

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Frost

293 A.D.2d 319, 739 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3610

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 11, 2002

StatusPublished

This text of 293 A.D.2d 319 (People v. Frost) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Frost, 293 A.D.2d 319, 739 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3610 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2002).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered October 23, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

After balancing all of the relevant factors (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442), we conclude that defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied. Most of the 37V2 month delay was attributable to defendant, including a period in which defendant absconded, and there has been no showing of prejudice. The fact that the original indictment was defective and had to be superseded caused only a short period of actual delay. Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Lerner, Rubin and Marlow, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Efrain Alvarado, J.), rendered October 23, 1995, convicting defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the fifth degree, and sentencing him, as a second felony offender, to a term of 2 to 4 years, unanimously affirmed.

After balancing all of the relevant factors (see, People v Taranovich, 37 NY2d 442), we conclude that defendant’s constitutional speedy trial motion was properly denied. Most of the 37V2 month delay was attributable to defendant, including a period in which defendant absconded, and there has been no showing of prejudice. The fact that the original indictment was defective and had to be superseded caused only a short period of actual delay. Concur—Williams, P.J., Saxe, Lerner, Rubin and Marlow, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 A.D.2d 319, 739 N.Y.S.2d 818, 2002 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3610, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frost-nyappdiv-2002.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack