People v. Frontuto
This text of 114 A.D.3d 1271 (People v. Frontuto) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal from a judgment of the Erie County Court (Sheila A. DiTullio, J.), rendered June 5, 2012. The judgment convicted defendant, upon his plea of guilty, of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree and unlawful possession of marihuana.
It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed.
Memorandum: Defendant appeals from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (Penal Law § 265.03 [3]) and unlawful possession of marihuana (§ 221.05). As the People correctly concede, because “[n]o mention of youthful offender status was made before defendant waived his right to appeal during the plea colloquy” (People v Anderson, 90 AD3d 1475, 1476 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 991 [2012]), defendant’s waiver of the right to appeal does not encompass his contention regarding County Court’s denial of his request for youthful offender status. We nevertheless reject defendant’s contention that the court abused its discretion in denying that request (see People v Lugo, 87 AD3d 1403, 1405 [2011], lv denied 18 NY3d 860 [2011]). The remedial measures of People v Rudolph (21 NY3d 497, 499 [2013]) do not [1272]*1272apply to the circumstances of this case. Present — Smith, J.P, Fahey, Carni, Valentino and Whalen, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
114 A.D.3d 1271, 980 N.Y.S.2d 861, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frontuto-nyappdiv-2014.