People v. Fritch

131 N.W. 1112, 166 Mich. 576, 1911 Mich. LEXIS 562
CourtMichigan Supreme Court
DecidedJuly 5, 1911
DocketCalendar No. 23,934
StatusPublished

This text of 131 N.W. 1112 (People v. Fritch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Fritch, 131 N.W. 1112, 166 Mich. 576, 1911 Mich. LEXIS 562 (Mich. 1911).

Opinion

Blair, J.

This is a petition, filed June 24, 1911, for stay of execution of sentence and admission to bail. Prior proceedings to obtain stay of execution of sentence will be found reported in 161 Mich. 111 (125 N. W. 785). After the denial of his application, for the reasons stated in the opinion, respondent proceeded with the settlement of his bill of exceptions, which was finally settled and signed April 26, 1911. On the 28th day of February, 1911, respondent caused a writ of error to be issued, as of course, out of this court, returnable on the 8th day of April, 1911. The time to make return to the writ of error was duly extended by orders of this court to May 1st, and June 1st, respectively.

The return to the writ of error has been duly made and filed in this court, as well as the printed record, and there is no reason apparent at this time why the case should not be disposed of at the October term of this court. Section 10490, 3 Comp. Laws, provides:

“Writs of error upon judgments in all other criminal cases shall issue of course, but they shall not stay or delay the execution of the judgment or sentence, unless they shall be allowed by one of the justices of the Supreme Court, or a circuit judge, with an express order thereon for a stay of proceedings on the judgment or sentence.”

As appears from the foregoing statement, the writ of error has been issued as of course and return made thereon. There is no petition for an order allowing a writ of error “ with an express order thereon,” etc.; nor is there any occasion for such an allowance.

It follows that the application must be denied, and it is so ordered.

Ostrander, C. J., and Bird, Hooker, and Stone, JJ., concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Fritch
125 N.W. 785 (Michigan Supreme Court, 1910)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
131 N.W. 1112, 166 Mich. 576, 1911 Mich. LEXIS 562, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-fritch-mich-1911.