Home/California Supreme Court/People v. Frierson

People v. Frierson

381 P.3d 232, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 286
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Frierson. Read the opinion of the Court — 226 Cal. Rptr. 3d 582 →
California Supreme Court·Decided October 19, 2016·No. S236728·Published

Opinion

The petition for review is granted. The issue to be briefed and argued is limited to the following: What is the standard of proof for a finding of ineligibility for resentencing under Proposition 36? (See People v. Arevalo (2016) 244 Cal.App.4th 836, 198 Cal.Rptr.3d 343 ; cf. People v. Osuna (2014) 225 Cal.App.4th 1020, 171 Cal.Rptr.3d 55.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Frierson, 381 P.3d 232, 208 Cal. Rptr. 3d 286 (Cal. 2016).

381 P.3d 232 (People v. Frierson) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Osuna
225 Cal. App. 4th 1020 (California Court of Appeal, 2014)
People v. Arevalo
244 Cal. App. 4th 836 (California Court of Appeal, 2016)