People v. Friedlander

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Friedlander

192 A.D.2d 672, 598 N.Y.S.2d 721

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided April 19, 1993·Published

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered March 19, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[673]*673Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation and that his right to the effective assistance of counsel was therefore satisfied (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (Paño Z. Patsalos, J.), rendered March 19, 1991, convicting him of murder in the second degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

[673]*673Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

A review of the record indicates that the defendant was afforded meaningful representation and that his right to the effective assistance of counsel was therefore satisfied (see, People v Satterfield, 66 NY2d 796, 798-799). Further, under the circumstances of this case, the sentence was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Bracken, J. P., Miller, Lawrence, Copertino and Santucci, JJ., concur.

People v. Friedlander, 192 A.D.2d 672, 598 N.Y.S.2d 721 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1993).

Pincite

192 A.D.2d 672 (People v. Friedlander) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related