People v. Frias

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Frias

214 A.D.2d 411, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4377

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedApril 18, 1995

StatusPublished

This text of 214 A.D.2d 411 (People v. Frias) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Frias, 214 A.D.2d 411, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4377 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 months’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

The officer’s testimony that he observed defendant through binoculars exchange a glassine for money with each of three buyers and two glassines with a fourth, as he stood about four doorways away from defendant on the same side of the street was found credible. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the ruling denying suppression. (People v Garcia, 207 AD2d 664.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Nicholas Figueroa, J.), rendered September 1, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, and sentencing him to a term of 8 months’ imprisonment, unanimously affirmed.

The officer’s testimony that he observed defendant through binoculars exchange a glassine for money with each of three buyers and two glassines with a fourth, as he stood about four doorways away from defendant on the same side of the street was found credible. Accordingly, we decline to disturb the ruling denying suppression. (People v Garcia, 207 AD2d 664.) Concur—Murphy, P. J., Rubin, Asch, Williams and Mazzarelli, JJ.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

214 A.D.2d 411, 625 N.Y.S.2d 899, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 4377, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frias-nyappdiv-1995.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack