People v. French

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. French

24 A.D.2d 657, 261 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3636

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 8, 1965

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 24 A.D.2d 657 (People v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. French, 24 A.D.2d 657, 261 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3636 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1965).

Pincite

Opinion

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Madison County, entered on a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of the crime of attempted sodomy, second degree (Penal Law, § 690). Appellant has been found guilty of attempted sodomy with a 14-year-old boy and the record contains ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The jury could properly find that appellant attempted the act but did not complete it (cf. People v. Cosad, 253 App. Div. 104). Appellant asserts also that he is entitled to a hearing under People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) as to voluntariness of his statement to investigator MeKaig. However, since appellant did not object to the admission of this testimony and the question of voluntariness was not submitted to the jury by the court no hearing is required (People v. Huntley, supra, p. 77). Judgment affirmed. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Reynolds, J.

Appeal from a judgment of conviction of the County Court, Madison County, entered on a jury verdict finding the appellant guilty of the crime of attempted sodomy, second degree (Penal Law, § 690). Appellant has been found guilty of attempted sodomy with a 14-year-old boy and the record contains ample evidence to support the jury’s verdict. The jury could properly find that appellant attempted the act but did not complete it (cf. People v. Cosad, 253 App. Div. 104). Appellant asserts also that he is entitled to a hearing under People v. Huntley (15 N Y 2d 72) as to voluntariness of his statement to investigator MeKaig. However, since appellant did not object to the admission of this testimony and the question of voluntariness was not submitted to the jury by the court no hearing is required (People v. Huntley, supra, p. 77). Judgment affirmed. Gibson, P. J., Herlihy, Taylor and Aulisi, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

24 A.D.2d 657, 261 N.Y.S.2d 239, 1965 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3636, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-french-nyappdiv-1965.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack