People v. French

Appellate Court of Illinois

People v. French

293 N.E.2d 136, 9 Ill. App. 3d 797, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 2845

CourtAppellate Court of Illinois

DecidedFebruary 5, 1973

Docket71-222

StatusPublished

Cited by4 cases

This text of 293 N.E.2d 136 (People v. French) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. French, 293 N.E.2d 136, 9 Ill. App. 3d 797, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 2845 (Ill. Ct. App. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from the judgment of the circuit court of Edwards County imposing a sentence of three years’ probation after a verdict of guilty of the offense of aggravated assault.

Defendant-appellant’s briefs were filed nearly three months prior to the court’s taking this case under advisement; however, no briefs were filed on behalf of the People and no extensions of time for filing briefs were sought.

Although on many occasions this court has determined that the doing of substantial justice required deciding a case on the merits notwithstanding the lack of briefs by the People, such a determination is an exercise of the discretion of this court. It should not be assumed that this court will, as a matter of course, act as advocate for one party as well as judge. We have determined that judgment should be reversed pro forma. People v. Spinelli, 83 Ill.App.2d 391, 227 N.E.2d 779; People v. Keeney, 96 Ill.App.2d 323. See also Shinn v. County Board of School Trustees of Marion County, 130 Ill.App.2d 908, 266 N.E.2d 123.

The decision of the circuit court of Edwards County is reversed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Defendant appeals from the judgment of the circuit court of Edwards County imposing a sentence of three years’ probation after a verdict of guilty of the offense of aggravated assault.

Defendant-appellant’s briefs were filed nearly three months prior to the court’s taking this case under advisement; however, no briefs were filed on behalf of the People and no extensions of time for filing briefs were sought.

Although on many occasions this court has determined that the doing of substantial justice required deciding a case on the merits notwithstanding the lack of briefs by the People, such a determination is an exercise of the discretion of this court. It should not be assumed that this court will, as a matter of course, act as advocate for one party as well as judge. We have determined that judgment should be reversed pro forma. People v. Spinelli, 83 Ill.App.2d 391, 227 N.E.2d 779; People v. Keeney, 96 Ill.App.2d 323. See also Shinn v. County Board of School Trustees of Marion County, 130 Ill.App.2d 908, 266 N.E.2d 123.

The decision of the circuit court of Edwards County is reversed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

293 N.E.2d 136, 9 Ill. App. 3d 797, 1973 Ill. App. LEXIS 2845, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-french-illappct-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack