People v. Freire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Freire

248 A.D.2d 726, 671 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3406

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMarch 30, 1998

StatusPublished

This text of 248 A.D.2d 726 (People v. Freire) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Freire, 248 A.D.2d 726, 671 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3406 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1998).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered December 3, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, official misconduct (three counts), and harassment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[727]*727Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in denying his application to sever counts 7 through 13 and 15 of the indictment from the remaining counts of the indictment since they were properly joined pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (b) (see, People v Griffin, 132 AD2d 569).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered December 3, 1996, convicting him of burglary in the first degree, official misconduct (three counts), and harassment in the second degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

[727]*727Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the County Court, Suffolk County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

Contrary to the defendant’s contention, the trial court did not err in denying his application to sever counts 7 through 13 and 15 of the indictment from the remaining counts of the indictment since they were properly joined pursuant to CPL 200.20 (2) (b) (see, People v Griffin, 132 AD2d 569).

The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for appellate review or without merit.

Bracken, J. P., O’Brien, Copertino and Pizzuto, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

248 A.D.2d 726, 671 N.Y.S.2d 269, 1998 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 3406, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-freire-nyappdiv-1998.