People v. Freiberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Freiberg

130 A.D.2d 505, 514 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46489

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedMay 4, 1987

StatusPublished

This text of 130 A.D.2d 505 (People v. Freiberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Freiberg, 130 A.D.2d 505, 514 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46489 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1987).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered April 9, 1986, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (18 counts), and falsifying business records in the first degree (4 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

After reviewing the record, we find that the prosecutor’s actions did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, affd 65 NY2d 837; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for review or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Owens, J.), rendered April 9, 1986, convicting him of grand larceny in the second degree, offering a false instrument for filing in the first degree (18 counts), and falsifying business records in the first degree (4 counts), upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, and the matter is remitted to the Supreme Court, Kings County, for further proceedings pursuant to CPL 460.50 (5).

After reviewing the record, we find that the prosecutor’s actions did not deprive the defendant of a fair trial (see, People v Roopchand, 107 AD2d 35, affd 65 NY2d 837; People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396). The defendant’s remaining contentions are either unpreserved for review or without merit. Mollen, P. J., Mangano, Brown and Lawrence, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

130 A.D.2d 505, 514 N.Y.S.2d 908, 1987 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 46489, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-freiberg-nyappdiv-1987.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack