People v. Freeman

2 A.D.3d 648, 768 N.Y.S.2d 344
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided December 15, 2003·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

Appeal by the de[649]*649fendant from a judgment of the County Court, Orange County (DeRosa, J.), rendered April 4, 2002, revoking a sentence of probation previously imposed by the same court, upon a finding that he had violated a condition thereof, and imposing a sentence of imprisonment upon his previous conviction of attempted criminal possession of a controlled substance in the third degree.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The defendant has not preserved for appellate review his contention that the County Court improperly resentenced him on his violation of probation because it failed to obtain an updated presentence report (see People v Segar, 295 AD2d 628 [2002]; People v Pierre-Paul, 289 AD2d 262 [2001]; People v Viruet, 288 AD2d 407 [2001]).

The sentence imposed was not excessive (see People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80 [1982]). Altman, J.P., S. Miller, McGinity, Adams and Mastro, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Freeman, 2 A.D.3d 648, 768 N.Y.S.2d 344 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2003).

2 A.D.3d 648 (People v. Freeman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Ruffino
52 A.D.3d 624 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2008)
People v. Rogers
45 A.D.3d 786 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2007)
People v. Ramirez
29 A.D.3d 1022 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)
People v. Gambichler
25 A.D.3d 722 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2006)