People v. Freeman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Freeman

224 A.D.2d 634, 639 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1403

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 20, 1996

StatusPublished

This text of 224 A.D.2d 634 (People v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Freeman, 224 A.D.2d 634, 639 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1403 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

Opinion

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered January 20, 1995, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request to withdraw his plea of guilty without a hearing (see, People v McCaskell, 206 AD2d 547; People v Brownlee, 158 AD2d 610). The defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete and detailed plea allocution in the presence of competent counsel after he was fully advised of the consequences of his plea (see, People v Brownlee, supra), and his conclusory allegations were insufficient to warrant a hearing (see, People v McCaskell, supra). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Suffolk County (Pitts, J.), rendered January 20, 1995, convicting him of attempted burglary in the third degree, upon his plea of guilty, and imposing sentence.

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.

The court properly exercised its discretion in denying the defendant’s request to withdraw his plea of guilty without a hearing (see, People v McCaskell, 206 AD2d 547; People v Brownlee, 158 AD2d 610). The defendant knowingly and voluntarily made a complete and detailed plea allocution in the presence of competent counsel after he was fully advised of the consequences of his plea (see, People v Brownlee, supra), and his conclusory allegations were insufficient to warrant a hearing (see, People v McCaskell, supra). Rosenblatt, J. P., Sullivan, Copertino, Santucci and Goldstein, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

224 A.D.2d 634, 639 N.Y.S.2d 699, 1996 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 1403, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-freeman-nyappdiv-1996.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack