People v. Freeman
This text of 697 N.W.2d 520 (People v. Freeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Michigan Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
PEOPLE of the State of Michigan, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Chastity Shesonie FREEMAN, Defendant-Appellant.
Supreme Court of Michigan.
On order of the Court, the application for leave to appeal the October 12, 2004 judgment of the Court of Appeals is considered, and it is DENIED, because we are not persuaded that the questions presented should be reviewed by this Court.
YOUNG, J., concurs and states as follows:
I concur in the denial because the "waiver break" in this case occurred before the issuance of People v. Ellis, 468 Mich. 25, 658 N.W.2d 142 (2003), which put the judiciary on notice that a "waiver break" is improper.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
697 N.W.2d 520, 472 Mich. 932, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-freeman-mich-2005.