People v. Freckleton
This text of 215 A.D.2d 687 (People v. Freckleton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appeal by the [688]*688defendant from a judgment of the County Court, Westchester County (Pirro, J.), rendered August 24, 1992, convicting him of murder in the second degree (two counts), assault in the first degree (three counts), criminal possession of a weapon in the second degree (three counts), and criminal possession of a weapon in the third degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.
Ordered that the judgment is affirmed.
Viewing the evidence in the light most favorable to the prosecution (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620), we find that it was legally sufficient to establish the defendant’s guilt beyond a reasonable doubt. Moreover, upon the exercise of our factual review power, we are satisfied that the verdict of guilt was not against the weight of the evidence (see, CPL 470.15 [5]).
The remarks by the prosecutor in the summation were fair comment on the evidence and constituted legitimate responses to the defense counsel’s summation (see, People v Galloway, 54 NY2d 396; see also, People v Ashwal, 39 NY2d 105).
The sentence imposed was not excessive (see, People v Suitte, 90 AD2d 80). Rosenblatt, J. P., Miller, Ritter and Krausman, JJ., concur.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
215 A.D.2d 687, 628 N.Y.S.2d 494, 1995 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5414, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-freckleton-nyappdiv-1995.