People v. Frazier

2018 NY Slip Op 6559
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in People v. Frazier. Read the opinion of the Court — 140 A.D.3d 977
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York·Decided October 3, 2018·No. 2007-01085·Published

Opinion

People v Frazier (2018 NY Slip Op 06559)
People v Frazier
2018 NY Slip Op 06559
Decided on October 3, 2018
Appellate Division, Second Department
Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
This opinion is uncorrected and subject to revision before publication in the Official Reports.


Decided on October 3, 2018 SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Second Judicial Department
JOHN M. LEVENTHAL, J.P.
LEONARD B. AUSTIN
JEFFREY A. COHEN
BETSY BARROS
LINDA CHRISTOPHER, JJ.

2007-01085
(Ind. No. 731/06)

[*1]The People of the State of New York, respondent,

v

Maurice Frazier, appellant.


Paul Skip Laisure, New York, NY (Lynn W. L. Fahey of counsel), for appellant.

Richard A. Brown, District Attorney, Kew Gardens, NY (John M. Castellano, Johnnette Traill, and Christopher J. Blira-Koessler of counsel; Robert Adler on the memorandum), for respondent.



DECISION & ORDER

Appeal by the defendant, as limited by his motion, from a sentence of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Randall T. Eng, J.), imposed January 23, 2007, on the ground that the sentence was excessive.

ORDERED that the sentence is affirmed.

The defendant's valid waiver of his right to appeal precludes appellate review of his contention that the sentence imposed was excessive (see People v Lopez, 6 NY3d 248, 255).

LEVENTHAL, J.P., AUSTIN, COHEN, BARROS and CHRISTOPHER, JJ., concur.

ENTER:

Aprilanne Agostino

Clerk of the Court



Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

People v. Frazier, 2018 NY Slip Op 6559 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2018).

2018 NY Slip Op 6559 (People v. Frazier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

People v. Lopez
844 N.E.2d 1145 (New York Court of Appeals, 2006)