People v. Frazier

91 A.D.3d 1319, 937 N.Y.2d 653
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedJanuary 31, 2012
StatusPublished
Cited by3 cases

This text of 91 A.D.3d 1319 (People v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Frazier, 91 A.D.3d 1319, 937 N.Y.2d 653 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2012).

Opinion

Memorandum: On appeal from a judgment convicting him upon his plea of guilty of manslaughter in the first degree (Penal Law § 125.20 [1]), defendant contends that County Court erred in sentencing him without the benefit of an adequate presentence report. Defendant failed to preserve that contention for our review (see People v Pomales, 37 AD3d 1098 [2007], lv denied 8 NY3d 949 [2007]; People v Diaz, 26 AD3d 768 [2006]). In any event, it is without merit (see People v Harrington, 3 AD3d 737, 739 [2004]; see also People v Rudduck, 85 AD3d 1557 [2011], lv denied 17 NY3d 861 [2011]). The sentence is not unduly harsh or severe. Present — Smith, J.E, Fahey, Garni, Sconiers and Gorski, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

BRADFORD, LAWRENCE M., PEOPLE v
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015
People v. Bradford
126 A.D.3d 1374 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2015)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
91 A.D.3d 1319, 937 N.Y.2d 653, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frazier-nyappdiv-2012.