Home/California Court of Appeal/People v. Frazier

People v. Frazier

43 Cal. App. 762
CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal
DecidedOctober 24, 1919
DocketCrim. No. 481
StatusPublished

This text of 43 Cal. App. 762 (People v. Frazier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering California Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Frazier, 43 Cal. App. 762 (Cal. Ct. App. 1919).

Opinion

THE COURT.

This is a companion case to People v. Peck, ante, p. 638, [185 Pac. 881]. [1] On a separate trial this defendant was convicted and sentenced to the penitentiary for an indeterminate period. The appeal is from said judgment. No argument, either oral or written, has been submitted in this court in behalf of appellant. His counsel appeared at the time set for the hearing, but declined to make any argument. We have, nevertheless, examined the record and have found abundant evidence to support the verdict. It may be stated further that we have discovered no prejudicial error, and we know of no reason why we should disturb the conclusion reached in the trial court.

The judgment is affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People v. Peck
185 P. 881 (California Court of Appeal, 1919)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
43 Cal. App. 762, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frazier-calctapp-1919.