People v. Frazer

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

People v. Frazer

112 A.D.2d 315, 491 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56273

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedJuly 15, 1985

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 112 A.D.2d 315 (People v. Frazer) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

People v. Frazer, 112 A.D.2d 315, 491 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56273 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1985).

Pincite

Opinion

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered November 22, 1983, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). As no exception to the charge was taken, defendant’s contention that a portion of the charge could be interpreted as shifting the burden of proof on the justification defense is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, People v Cadorette, 56 NY2d 1007). Under the circumstances of this case, including the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, interest of justice review is not warranted. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Appeal by defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County (Deeley, J.), rendered November 22, 1983, convicting him of assault in the first degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence.

Judgment affirmed.

Defendant’s guilt was established beyond a reasonable doubt (see, People v Contes, 60 NY2d 620). As no exception to the charge was taken, defendant’s contention that a portion of the charge could be interpreted as shifting the burden of proof on the justification defense is unpreserved for appellate review as a matter of law (CPL 470.05 [2]; see, People v Cadorette, 56 NY2d 1007). Under the circumstances of this case, including the overwhelming evidence of defendant’s guilt, interest of justice review is not warranted. Mangano, J. P., Gibbons, Bracken and O’Connor, JJ., concur.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

112 A.D.2d 315, 491 N.Y.S.2d 762, 1985 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 56273, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-frazer-nyappdiv-1985.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack