People v. Franza

239 A.D.2d 201, 658 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5162
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedMay 13, 1997
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 239 A.D.2d 201 (People v. Franza) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
People v. Franza, 239 A.D.2d 201, 658 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5162 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1997).

Opinion

Judgment, Supreme Court, New York County (Paul Bookson, J.), rendered April 8, 1992, convicting defendant, after a jury trial, of three counts of attempted murder in the second degree and one count of criminal possession of a weapon in the first degree, and sentencing him to consecutive terms of 81/3 to 25 years, 81/3 to 25 years, 8Vs to 25 years and 3 to 9 years, respectively, and an order of the same court and Justice, entered on or about October 19, 1993, denying, without a hearing, defendant’s CPL 440.10 motion to vacate the judgment of conviction, unanimously affirmed.

[202]*202The circumstantial evidence of guilt, including several highly incriminating items of handwriting evidence, was legally sufficient, and the verdict was not against the weight of the evidence (see, People v Gates, 24 NY2d 666, 668-669). Defendant’s contention that there was no probable cause for the issuance of a search warrant for his apartment is without merit, since, under the circumstances, it was reasonable to conclude that the items used to make the pipebomb would be found in his residence (see, People v Mendez, 199 AD2d 182, lv denied 83 NY2d 874). The court’s charge on circumstantial evidence conveyed the appropriate standards (People v Sanchez, 61 NY2d 1022). We perceive no abuse of discretion in sentencing. We have considered defendant’s remaining contentions, including those addressed to the denial of his motion to vacate judgment, and find them to be without merit. Concur—Sullivan, J. P., Milonas, Nardelli and Williams, JJ.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

People ex rel. Franza v. Lape
61 A.D.3d 1200 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 2009)
Franza v. Stinson
58 F. Supp. 2d 124 (S.D. New York, 1999)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
239 A.D.2d 201, 658 N.Y.S.2d 4, 1997 N.Y. App. Div. LEXIS 5162, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/people-v-franza-nyappdiv-1997.